Connect with us

Blog

Match Readiness Report: FC Groningen vs Heracles

1. Main Players Comparison 

FC Groningen 
- Core: Etienne Vaessen (29, GK – 33 apps, reliable starter), Marco Rente (28, CB – 30 apps, 2G/1A), Thom van Bergen (21, FW – 29 apps, 5G). 
- Midfield: Stije Resink (22, DM – 25 apps, 5G/2A), Leandro Bacuna (33, versatile – 25 apps, 4G/3A, but left), Johan Hove (24, CM – 20 apps, ball recycler). 
- Attack: Luciano Valente (21, AM – 31 apps, 2G/7A, departed), Jorg Schreuders (20, AM – 23 apps, 5G/1A). 
- Output: Losing Valente & Bacuna weakens creativity, but Resink and Schreuders show promise. Attack lacks consistency beyond van Bergen. 
- Stability: Defensive base steady with Vaessen + Rente, but departures reduce midfield spine.

 

Heracles 
- Core: Fabian de Keijzer (25, GK – ever-present, 3060 mins), Damon Mirani (29, CB/DM – 34 apps, 2G), Ivan Mesík (24, CB – 33 apps). 
- Midfield: Brian De Keersmaecker (25, DM – 31 apps, 5G/3A, departed), Sem Scheperman (22, CM – 17 apps, 1G/1A). 
- Attack: Jizz Hornkamp (27, FW – 19 apps, 8G/2A, suspended), Luka Kulenovic (25, CF – 15 apps, 9G/2A), Suf Podgoreanu (23, AM – 28 apps, 1G/5A, departed). 
- Output: Kulenovic provides strong forward threat, but suspension of Hornkamp and Podgoreanu’s exit weaken rotation. 
- Stability: Solid defensive base with Mirani and Mesík, but midfield leadership dipped with De Keersmaecker’s departure. 

 

2. New Players Comparison 

FC Groningen 
- Oskar Zawada (29, CF – 24 apps, 9G – instant impact forward). 
- Tyrique Mercera (21, RB – prospect). 
- Elvis van der Laan (17, CB – youth depth). 
- Younes Taha (22, RW – attacking wing addition). 
- Kristian Strømland Lien (24, CF – backup option). 
- Value: Zawada boosts scoring, but most additions are young prospects with limited experience. 

 

Heracles 
- Yvandro Borges Sanches (21, LW – pace injection). 
- Ajdin Hrustić (29, AM – creativity, Serie A experience). 
- Leco Zeevalkink (19, GK – developmental). 
- Mike te Wierik (33, CB – veteran stability). 
- Jeff Reine-Adélaïde (27, AM – technical, currently injured). 
- Antonio Satriano (21, CF – youth striker). 
- Value: More experienced signings than Groningen (Hrustić, Reine-Adélaïde, te Wierik), though injuries limit short-term returns. 

 

3. Substitutes Comparison 

FC Groningen 
- Depth: Postema (23, FW – 13 apps, 2G), Oosting (25, AM – 8 apps, 1G), Seuntjens (33, AM – 9 apps, 2G/2A). 
- Defensive cover via Finn Stam (22, LB) and Peersman (34, CB/LB). 
- Impact: Rotation players can add ~6–8 goals but lack consistency. 

 

Heracles 
- Depth: Thomas Bruns (33, CM – 14 apps, 3G/2A), Daniël van Kaam (24, CM – 12 apps, 3A), Bryan Limbombe (24, AM – pace). 
- Defensive rotation via Roosken (25, LB – 15 apps, 1G/2A) and Jannes Wieckhoff (24, RB – 13 apps, 2A). 
- Impact: More experienced subs compared to Groningen, midfield creativity stronger with Bruns + van Kaam. 

 

4. Consolidated Quality Scorecard 

Category 

FC Groningen Rating 

Heracles Rating 

Main Players 

⭐⭐ (loss of Bacuna & Valente hurts creativity) 

⭐⭐⭐ (solid defense + Kulenovic threat, but Hornkamp suspended) 

New Players 

⭐⭐ (Zawada boosts attack, rest prospects) 

⭐⭐⭐ (Hrustić & Reine-Adélaïde strong but fitness issues) 

Substitutes 

⭐⭐ (few impact players, limited scoring depth) 

⭐⭐⭐ (Bruns, van Kaam provide better balance & creativity) 

Overall Depth 

Thinner after exits, reliant on youth 

More experienced depth despite key suspensions 

Key Weakness 

Creativity gap, over-reliant on Resink/van Bergen 

Injuries + Hornkamp suspension weaken attack rotation 

 

5. Injuries & Suspensions (with impact) 

FC Groningen 
- No major first-team injuries reported. 
- Squad mostly available, but thin after summer departures. 

 

Heracles 
- Jizz Hornkamp – Suspended (loss of main forward option). 
- Jeff Reine-Adélaïde – Injured (early Sept, creativity loss in midfield). 
- Mario Engels – Injured (early Sept, attacking depth weakened). 
- Fofin Turay – Achilles tendon injury, doubtful (defensive cover reduced). 
- Sava Cestic – Broken ankle, doubtful (defensive rotation weakened). 
Impact: Groningen healthier but lacks squad quality; Heracles hit by absences but retains stronger depth in midfield. 

 

6. Predicted Outcome 

- FC Groningen: Zawada improves attack but overall reliance on youth leaves them exposed. 
- Heracles: Despite injuries, they keep stronger midfield options and Kulenovic’s scoring form. 
 
Likely Result: FC Groningen 1 – 2 Heracles 

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Blog

  • Torino vs Fiorentina

    Core Players & Star QualityTorino • Milinković-Savić (37 apps, 3330 mins) is the ever-present in...

  • Lazio vs Verona

    Core Players & Star QualityLazio • Strong spine: Guendouzi (3275 mins), Rovella (2729), Gila (2743),...

  • Inter vs Udinese

    Core Players & Star QualityInter • Retain a strong Serie A-winning core: Lautaro Martínez, Sommer,...

  • Genoa vs Juventus

    Report_Genoa vs Juventus Core Players & Star QualityGenoa Defensive leaders: Frendrup (3107 mins, 2G), Aarón...

Data powered by
× How can I help you?